Show summary Hide summary
- Who signed — and why their voices matter
- Core concerns about the merger’s impact
- Leading organizations and legal action backing the protest
- Public statements from industry leaders
- Specific harms the letter highlights
- How the campaign is organized and how to join
- What the open letter argues in plain terms
- How industry trends factor into the objections
- Text excerpts that reflect the signers’ demands
More than a thousand film and TV professionals have joined forces to challenge the proposed merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery. Their open letter warns the deal could reshape the industry, narrowing creative opportunities and concentrating economic power in ways that could harm creators and audiences alike.
Who signed — and why their voices matter
The petition brings together a broad cross-section of the creative community. Signers include directors, actors, writers, documentarians, producers, and industry workers.
Spirit elite status: claim a status match from these airlines now
John Cena teases history-making WWE Backlash role
- High-profile names: David Fincher, Kristen Stewart, Yorgos Lanthimos, Denis Villeneuve, J.J. Abrams, Lily Gladstone, Boots Riley, Daniel Kwan, Rose Byrne, and Mark Ruffalo.
- Credentials: More than 75 Academy Award winners and nominees joined the appeal.
- Open to more: The roster is still accepting additional endorsements from industry figures.
Core concerns about the merger’s impact
Signatories argue the deal would accelerate existing trends toward consolidation. They warn of fewer films, shrinking diversity of content, and diminished career paths for the many craftspeople who make media possible.
- Fewer creative opportunities: A concentrated market gives fewer gatekeepers the power to decide which stories get financed.
- Economic squeeze: Mid-budget films and independent distributors could vanish, harming small businesses and local production ecosystems.
- Weakened industry norms: The letter points to risks for profit participation, credit integrity, and fair compensation.
Leading organizations and legal action backing the protest
The letter is backed by a coalition of advocacy groups, industry associations, and policy organizations mobilizing to oppose the merger.
- Democracy Defenders Fund
- Committee for the First Amendment
- Future Film Coalition
- Writers Guild of America West
- Free Press
- International Documentary Association
- American Economic Liberties Project
- Platkin LLP
- Freedom of the Press Foundation
- Center for American Progress
California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other state attorneys general are reportedly examining the transaction. The coalition publicly supports governmental scrutiny and potential legal challenges.
Public statements from industry leaders
A former activist voice weighs in
Jane Fonda, who founded the modern Committee for the First Amendment, framed the merger as a threat to free speech and creative autonomy. She urged using “every tool available” to stop the consolidation.
Guild leadership sounds the alarm
Michele Mulroney, President of the Writers Guild of America West, warned the combined company could squeeze writer pay, reduce program variety, and worsen working conditions. She called for blocking the sale to preserve jobs and compensation.
Specific harms the letter highlights
The signers list several concrete harms they believe are likely if the merger succeeds. These are presented as systemic, not hypothetical.
- Disappearance of the mid-budget film market.
- Erosion of independent distribution and sales channels.
- Collapse of international sales markets that sustain global projects.
- Elimination or dilution of meaningful profit participation for creators.
- Weakening of screen credit practices and industry standards.
The letter frames these trends as threats to both local jobs and global cultural exchange.
How the campaign is organized and how to join
The open letter remains available for additional signatures from the industry. Organizers are also collecting personal stories about how the merger would affect livelihoods.
- Public petition: Supporters are encouraged to sign the #BlocktheMerger petition.
- Story sharing: Individuals are asked to submit accounts about how consolidation would impact them.
- Coalition support: Groups plan to coordinate with state attorneys general and other legal efforts.
What the open letter argues in plain terms
The signers say the merger would concentrate market power when diversity and competition are already under pressure. They describe a future with fewer production paths, lower wages, and less choice for viewers.
Competition, they write, is essential for a healthy economy and a healthy democracy. The letter calls for thoughtful regulation and enforcement to preserve a pluralistic media environment.
How industry trends factor into the objections
Signers point to past consolidation as evidence for their warnings. They trace declining film volumes and narrowing story types to previous mergers.
- Consolidation has reduced the number of players making funding decisions.
- Smaller businesses that supply crews, local services, and indie producers face shrinking prospects.
- Audience choice contracts as distribution channels narrow and global sales fall.
The coalition argues that blocking the merger is not just a corporate issue, but a public interest matter that affects culture, jobs, and consumer choice.
Text excerpts that reflect the signers’ demands
The open letter urges government officials to investigate and, if warranted, to block the deal. It frames such action as necessary to protect competition, preserve jobs, and maintain a vibrant creative sector.
Signers pledge to assist legal efforts and to support policies that sustain independent makers and diverse storytelling. They call on regulators to prioritize the public good over a small set of powerful investors.
